I was in three topics total during my brief stay. Not exactly the sort of thing I really think will leave people stranded, particularly because I tied things up in the story one by Firestorm, and linked that roleplayed exit to Tazy's topic, where my character left. All roleplayed, all done nice and neat.Selene Starblade wrote:Uh-huh. What about, oh, I don't know, the TOPICS YOU WERE DISCUSSING IN ON OTHER PARTS OF VGF. Whether or not you informed Firestorm, you said nothing outside of this topic about your reasons for leaving the entire BBS, and made it rather plain that you didn't intend to ever return.
I also didn't think it was necessary to state my reasons for leaving. Naturally, I assumed that since I had only just arrived I could leave just as easily. Apparently not.
Note: The following comparison is not meant in any way to insult Wyborn or the Gunjin.I can see where this applies to the Gunjin. Now please explain how his position as a top battler also means that he is representative of the entire VGF community. Because I honestly can't see that.
I like it to foreign countries and the USA. George Bush, Condoleeza Rice, and all the other high-ranked people in the government are being watched by those foreign countries, and the US is judged as a whole based on those observations. They see Bush keep upholding the Iraq War and they see Americans as bloodthirsty barbarians who can't keep their noses out of their business.
People held in high esteem by something or someone will reflect what an outsider sees. The outsider sees that someone of good standing keeps company with a downright criminal, the person of good standing is no longer respected. Same with the Gunjin. I see Wyborn, someone in good standing with the community, and I automatically think that the Gunjin reflects this person, or why else would he be in such standing? This is logical thinking.
I said I lack empathy, that is correct. However, I also said that I follow what is logical. Being polite is logical. Being kind is logical. Happiness is logical. Thinking of whether or not I will offend is logical. Keeping others in mind with what I do is logical. That is my logic, not the narcissistic logic you have me pegged for.Did I say 'you should have said and done nothing'? Where did I say that? I sure don't remember saying that.
And if you don't feel any empathy for others, well then, that's one of the most critical parts of the definition of 'N00b'. Thinking only of things as they relate to you in the emotional sense, and not caring about the impact on others. Logic is very good for math and for certain forms of science. For dealing with people, it flies about like a lead brick.
Name something I said that was wrong. Keeping in mind that in a debate the definitions of right and wrong fluctuate depending on the person.If you haven't noticed, regardless of the facts of things you QUOTED, the things you SAID are largely either a: wrong, b: demonstrative of an inability to take into account the intrinsic value of other people, or c: blatantly inflammatory without due reason.
I find that human beings do have intrinsic value, especially after seeing what they are capable of. Once again, not the narcissist logic you think I use.
I am never inflammatory without due cause. I am one of the meekest voices you will hear on the Internet. It's when I find a cause to fight for and know that logic is in my favor that I strike back.
That was more of a parting shot at whoever did nominate me. I honestly couldn't care less about awards or titles. I can look at my work and say that doesn't match what others say about me, so I can safely dismiss that.Regardless of all else, my grumph over misinterperetation was about you interpereting the nomination for the N00b award as resulting from what you did in this topic.
I came back to set the record straight that Frost was dead and there was no reason for Wyborn to continuously drag this topic up unnecessarily. Nothing more. We began the argument on AIM, which was a pointless endeavor since he kept dodging my statements.****all about this topic, that award's for your overreaction to this topic by simply abandoning this entire social group as untenable. The manner in which you have chosen to continue this argument (and, in fact, the very fact that you came back for no other reason than to continue said argument, despite having ostensibly finished) demonstrates what is considered a N00bish attitude. I and most other people don't give a heap of rotting fishheads about your skill level or what you're used to, your attitude, particularly relating to the way you chose to assume that everyone on this entire BBS is exactly like one representative member (which isn't even a logical assumption, nevermind a valid one), and thus with no consideration to how it would miff, irritate, inconvenience, or trouble others, left.
Nobody cares about my skill, not even me. I look at it as a talent that needs a lot of work in order to be useful. I don't look down on other writers based on their skill, because I was once at that level. I don't look up to other writers based on their skill, because I will one day be at their level. What I am used to is simple, fairness. Which was doing just fine until the final post. Simple enough to expect, yes?
Again, I was a drifter who had blown in, posted a bit, then decided to blow out. There was no one who was at all inconvenienced, because I took the time to tie up the loose ends before walking out the door. A drifter does not draw attention, and if he does then he is quickly forgotten after he passes through. Do you think that Galefore or Wyborn is remembered on KAF, even after their gaffe there? No, they were a couple of new people who came in, dabbled a bit, then left. Nothing new, nothing noteworthy, nothing to care about.
I responded to the argument in the only logical way: by showing the evidence, stating my view of it, and clinching it all together in one neat package.Again, my irritation is over a: the fact that you decided to respond to the existence of this argument in an inconsiderate, illogical, and unsensible manner and b: that you misinterpereted the award nomination as being because you argued with Wyborn.
Arguing is natural. Even if it were because I argued, why would I care about someone who thinks no one should argue? Arguing is what gets things decided.Particularly since, as Wyborn can tell you, I ARGUE WITH HIM ALL THE FETHING TIME about battle-related stuff- particularly physics, spirituality, and likely actions and responses of characters. And frequently, we each have to give up on convincing the other of something, and just try something other than what we originally intended. It's inconvenient to us, but considerate to each other, and to anyone who happens to feel like reading what we write.
Indeed. And I am communicating based on what I see you communicating. Like you said, if you are misinterpreting me, then I am misinterpreting you.So no, if I'm misinterpereting what you say, you're clearly doing just as badly at interpereting what I say. Communication is two ways, Nameless. TWO ways.
Logic wasn't working. I figured maybe harsh language would. That's not exactly my strong point, as you observed.Sidenote: Tazy, what the heck are you doing here?
Further sidenote: Incidentally, Nameless, if you intend to somehow make your argument more convincing by calling people names like 'naive moron', I strongly suggest other methods.