Page 1 of 1

New research on female video game characters uncovers a surprising twist

Posted: Thu Nov 14, 2024 3:07 am
by I REALLY HATE POKEMON!
https://www.psypost.org/new-research-on ... ing-twist/
Female gamers prefer playing as highly sexualized characters, despite disliking them
I tried quoting the entire article, unfortunately it surpassed the post's character limit, so I just snipped the opener. I suggest reading the whole thing, but that's the main "twist" the headline refers to.

Anyway, while I usually take studies with a grain of salt--and don't think this was conducted in the best way nor initiated with neutral scientific intent (also finding some of what's being taken from the conclusions to be misguided)--I do think it's interesting that female gamers showed preference for these character traits. It is a bit surprising, but not exactly shocking since sexualization typically coincides with a beautiful character, and beauty itself can be appreciated by either gender.

A more specific qualm (among several) I have with the study is I don't think they did an adequate job defining what exactly they constitute as "sexualized". It seems to be a common sentiment now that even merely designing a character not to be outstandingly unattractive is a form of sexualization, a notion popular with developers in recent years, especially western ones. They even go as far as to use facial capture technology on beautiful women...and then alter the in-game model to be uglier. Some example images:
Spoiler.
Image
Image
So do you think the study has any merits? I'm mixed on it personally, but I'm glad it's a subject being looked at regardless.

Re: New research on female video game characters uncovers a surprising twist

Posted: Fri Nov 15, 2024 1:34 pm
by Mario500
(note: profanity in this article)

Re: New research on female video game characters uncovers a surprising twist

Posted: Fri Nov 15, 2024 9:30 pm
by I REALLY HATE POKEMON!
Mario500 wrote:
Fri Nov 15, 2024 1:34 pm
(note: profanity in this article)
I must've missed it, it's a fairly dry scientific article so I'm surprised there's any, but thanks for the notice.