Page 1 of 1

Posted: Mon Feb 17, 2003 9:29 pm
by Grand Moff Sisk
^Indeed.

Posted: Fri Feb 21, 2003 12:32 am
by Super Citrus Man 128
Originally posted by Marth:
if its free
LOL

Posted: Fri Feb 21, 2003 11:10 pm
by kamek241
No. Monthly fees suck ass.

Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2003 4:05 pm
by Greatluigi
MMORPG? :confused:

Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2003 8:55 pm
by give me food
^It's very addicting o_o; like a drug

Posted: Sat Mar 08, 2003 2:27 pm
by Shinigami
No.

Posted: Sat Mar 08, 2003 4:37 pm
by Pokevulpix
Originally posted by Black Mage:
^ It's the best one.
Addicting doesn't always equal Good. I tried EQ, and I just couldn't do it. Just couldn't. I play DAoC, and while it can get boring, I personally prefer it to EQ. EQ, however, is made by a bigger name and gets more suscribers. However, almost all who have played UO have said that it was the best MMORPG that they have played. Personally, I'm looking forward to SWG, but if they continue to keep PvP the way it is, I'll switch to Planetside or Shadowbane or maybe just continue with DAoC.

Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2003 12:53 pm
by Ditto McCloaker
Not that I think a Massive-Multiplayer Zelda game would be a wise idea (although... play as a Shiekah too and maybe I'll consider it), who says Massive Multiplayer games must be RPGS? Why not make 'em adventures LIKE Zelda?