Page 1 of 3
With all the Final Fantays Sequel Square is doing now
Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2008 4:54 am
by JaredThaJa888
Why not go back and do some to the old Classic 2D ones as well? preferably sitll atleats partly in 2D meaning probably only Nintendo would be willing to Publish them, but they'd have an Audience.
I mean if they can bring back the lame Charlie's Angels wannabes from FFX why not a Bad@$$ villain like Kefka?
Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2008 8:38 am
by I REALLY HATE POKEMON!
Mega Man 9 did prove old school graphics are still appealing to people, so if Capcom can do it, I know Square can. I agree they should bring back some old school flare to RPGs.
Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2008 8:48 am
by JaredThaJa888
Most definitely, and I sitll general prefer to Medieval Dark Age setting to the Futuristic settings of current FF games.
Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2008 11:30 am
by Crazyswordsman
They are making a sequel to FFIV. -CSM
Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2008 11:53 am
by X-3
^Actually, it's been made. It had different parts that come out that you need to download.
Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2008 12:18 pm
by Tonberry2k
Not only that, but it's on cell phone, so we'll probably never see it.
They remade FF4 in 3-D, so that's a good start. I wish they'd do FF6. there's been a rumor of a FF6 sequel for a few years. it was supposed to star Shadow.
Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2008 5:46 pm
by Valigarmander
You just might be on to something.
They can call it Final Fantasy VII: I Know, We Made Another One.
Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2008 6:01 pm
by 1-up Salesman
I don't mind Final Fantasy VII that much. I'm trying to find a PS-One memory card so I can play it.
Though sequels to some of these old-school classics is a must.
Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2008 7:15 pm
by I REALLY HATE POKEMON!
Some FF games need sequels. FF8, FF9 and FF10, definitely.
Uh, except, FFX-3 needs to focus on Auron and Jecht and not be anything like FFX-2. Ah, and Dissidia needs to become a sub-franchise with regular sequels.
Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2008 7:38 pm
by 1-up Salesman
Be ready to be flamed, IRHP. Not by me, but by these man-eating Tidus and FFX haters.
Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2008 7:44 pm
by I REALLY HATE POKEMON!
Nah, everyone loves Auron. But I do predict it may happen anyway. Seems few love FF8 as I do.
Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2008 7:46 pm
by JaredThaJa888
I was also a big fan of Mystic Quest, maybe it could get a Sequel too.
Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2008 7:46 pm
by ZeldaGirl
1-up salesman wrote:Be ready to be flamed, IRHP. Not by me, but by these man-eating Tidus and FFX haters.
I actually love FFX and Tidus really didn't bother me all that much.
Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2008 8:29 pm
by I REALLY HATE POKEMON!
Haha, at this point I could claim Vaan and Tidus were the best FF characters ever; Mystic Quest is now the focus of fan-boy rage. =P
^ I feel the same way. I didn't like Tidus all that much as a character, but I loved his story and his origin. It was unique and lived up to what a fantasy really is.
Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2008 9:48 pm
by Valigarmander
JaredThaJAsWelch wrote:I was also a big fan of Mystic Quest, maybe it could get a Sequel too.
It did. It was called
Secret of Mana.
Branched off into it's own Square sub-franchise.
Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2008 10:20 pm
by Bomby
Secret of Mana was a sequel to Final Fantasy Adventure, not Mystic Quest.
Unless you live in Europe, where Final Fantasy Adventure was in fact called Mystic Quest.
Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2008 10:27 pm
by I REALLY HATE POKEMON!
Well that's confusing. Whichever game starts with an earthquake, that one kinda sucks.
Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 12:15 am
by Valigarmander
Bomby wrote:Secret of Mana was a sequel to Final Fantasy Adventure, not Mystic Quest.
Unless you live in Europe, where Final Fantasy Adventure was in fact called Mystic Quest.
Ah.
Damn Europeans.
Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 1:16 am
by JaredThaJa888
What I loved Mystic Quest?
Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 2:44 am
by I REALLY HATE POKEMON!
^ I don't know, did you? =P